|
|
|
|
James W. Grice, Ph.D. Professor Ph.D., University of New Mexico, 1995 B.S., Wright State University, 1987
Department of Psychology
e-mail: james.grice]att[okstate.edu.
Schedule: |
I am a quantitative/personality psychologist with specific interests in
multivariate statistical methods and personality assessment. I have published and presented a number
of papers on factor scores (see link below) and have completed the second
version of a computer program (see link below) for administering, manipulating,
and analyzing repertory grids and other forms of self-report data. I also have
interests in philosophy of science, George Kelly's Personal Construct
Psychology, C. G. Jung's theory of personality, the Roman Catholic intellectual
and mystical traditions, and psychology of religion.
My students and I are currently pursuing several lines of research. First, we
are studying a mathematical model of self-reflexion and using it to predict
overall patterns of responses to binary adjectives (e.g., "happy-sad",
"outgoing-shy") commonly employed in personality, social, and attitudinal
research. We have conducted three studies with this model, and the results are
promising but unconvincing. For future studies we are planning a number of
experimental manipulations to test specific parameters of the model. On the
analytical front, we hope to develop the model further to work on an individual
level rather than across individuals.
Our second line of research involves applying repertory grid methods (using
Idiogrid) and George Kelly's Personal Construct Theory to problems in mainstream
personality and social psychology. In two studies we developed methods for
comparing, contrasting, and combining nomothetic and idiographic ratings of self
and others. We were then able to empirically assess the effectiveness of the Big
Five personality factors in encompassing individuals' free-response descriptions
of themselves and others. We found that approximately 50% of the variability in
the ratings for the free-response descriptions was left unaccounted for by the
Big Five factors. In two other studies we used repertory grid methods to assess self-discrepancies between
individuals' actual, ideal, and ought selves on marker items for the Big Five
personality factors. Our methods represented a substantial improvement over
existing methods for assessing self-discrepancies. With these improved methods,
however, we were not able to replicate many of the touted findings linking
different self-discrepancies to particular emotional states. In future studies,
we plan to expand upon these studies and to develop and test a new scaling
method for repertory grids.
Further information regarding our research can be found at:
Personality Research Laboratory at OSU
|
|
*Courses without active links are offline until offered again.
|
Last update: 19-January-2010