Work in our laboratory is driven by two central premises.
First, significant advances in the science of personality psychology are likely
to depend on prior advances in measurement and quantitative analysis. Second, to be relevant, the scientific
concepts employed by personality psychologists must enlighten our
understanding of the individual person. In other words, the science of personality psychology
must not be limited to what is traditionally termed nomothetic research.
As a result of these two premises, research in our
laboratory is quantitative and idiographic in nature. Stating that our
research is idiographic, however, is not an argument for the exclusion of nomothetic
constructs or traditional nomothetic methodologies. In fact, much of our recent work has focused on
developing methods for bridging the so-called idiographic-nomothetic divide. On
the quantitative front, we have been employing a little-known type of
confirmatory principal components analysis (Multiple Group Components
Analysis) as well as Generalized Procrustes analysis to compare and merge
idiographic and nomothetic ratings of self and others. With
regard to idiographic methods, we have primarily been using variations of
George Kelly's repertory grid technique to assess how individuals view
themselves and others. In the future, we hope to resurrect and improve
upon some old scaling methods. By using these methods, we hope to improve
the quality of data obtained from the procedures we use in our lab.

Material on these web pages last updated:
15-August-2007.
These web pages were designed by
James Barraclough before he graduated from the Department of Psychology at OSU.